The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community banner

1 - 20 of 40 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,428 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Trump vs. Twitter ?

twitter started to fact check Trump while letting other statements slide...LOL Trump signed an executive order that could end the 20 year old social media liability protections...LOL

good for him. if you fact check one, check them all. i hope this succeeds and puts and end to fake news forever.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,677 Posts
Now there is a battle.....think of the implications to HPA!!!! :smile_big:

I've never cared about Twitter or anything Twitter related. And that's not going to change. The fact that anybody would care anything about it really shows how far in the gutter things are.....:sad:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,428 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
maybe this was his goal all along. it just took twitter a long time to step into the pile :)
Twitter supposedly ignored other posts and checked Trumps. Trump wants the playground to be even. I LOVE IT. he should do something about all that lying in all the campaign ads too.
if they get caught lying in the ads, they should be kicked out of the race and out of office for life.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,482 Posts
So everyone is cool with big government controlling the freedom of speech of a private company??
Just checking because that's a direct violation of our first amendment.
They didn't sensor him they added a fact check. Like a moderator editing a swear word or what have you.
But how much of a Trump loyalist do you have to be to give up your right?
Remember there will be a Democratic wanna be dictator in at some point and they will do the same. Remember Obama he would sign an executive order just like this using government to limit personal rights and business and that was bad but now it's good?
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
27,892 Posts
Yep, I love it! Twitter can apply the same rules to all or they'll get to apply their bias to none! The same should happen to the main scream media also. If they don't like it, too bad so sad. Their the ones that brought their socialist games to the table and now it will be an absolute pleasure to see the tables turned against them! YeeeeHaw!!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
190 Posts
So everyone is cool with big government controlling the freedom of speech of a private company??
Just checking because that's a direct violation of our first amendment.
They didn't sensor him they added a fact check. Like a moderator editing a swear word or what have you.
But how much of a Trump loyalist do you have to be to give up your right?
Remember there will be a Democratic wanna be dictator in at some point and they will do the same. Remember Obama he would sign an executive order just like this using government to limit personal rights and business and that was bad but now it's good?
I think maybe you need to check your facts. This will protect freedom of speech.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,482 Posts
So everyone is cool with big government controlling the freedom of speech of a private company??
Just checking because that's a direct violation of our first amendment.
They didn't sensor him they added a fact check. Like a moderator editing a swear word or what have you.
But how much of a Trump loyalist do you have to be to give up your right?
Remember there will be a Democratic wanna be dictator in at some point and they will do the same. Remember Obama he would sign an executive order just like this using government to limit personal rights and business and that was bad but now it's good?
I think maybe you need to check your facts. This will protect freedom of speech.
Nope your wrong.
And it looks like the rest of the white house the VP and all are completely against Trump on this
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,428 Posts
Discussion Starter #9
Trump isnt saying they cant post what they want. post anything they like as long as its true.


its not censorship its protecting people from being slandered or libeled. what wrong with that ? OH....the dems wont be able to lie and post all their fake news claims...lol


how would you like it if "private" companies started posting all kinds of stuff about you, your wife and children that were complete lies and causing problems for your family. those liability protections Trump wants removed prevents you from taking legal action against that private company.


i hope he succeeds and it puts and end to all the slander and hate in those campaign ads and facebook and twitter and foreign fake ads against any politician and all the lying and distorting on TV news reports. time to get back to the truth.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,677 Posts
They can call the set of rules established to control Twitter and the media the Chyna Model and enforce it equally....just like China does.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,972 Posts
So everyone is cool with big government controlling the freedom of speech of a private company??
Just checking because that's a direct violation of our first amendment.
They didn't sensor him they added a fact check. Like a moderator editing a swear word or what have you.
But how much of a Trump loyalist do you have to be to give up your right?
Remember there will be a Democratic wanna be dictator in at some point and they will do the same. Remember Obama he would sign an executive order just like this using government to limit personal rights and business and that was bad but now it's good?
Better check again Dragman, they did censor Him last night.

Twitter promptly censored Trump’s tweet, saying it “violated the Twitter Rules about glorifying violence.”

Ya think they censor Antifa? Or BLM? Tweets floating out of M-SP by either of those?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/twitter-censors-trump-for-anti-riots-tweet-trump-fires-back
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,039 Posts
I know I don’t want Twitter or some similar company straining the comments of anyone through their filter.

Isn’t that how Goebbels started?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,333 Posts
So everyone is cool with big government controlling the freedom of speech of a private company??
Just checking because that's a direct violation of our first amendment.
They didn't sensor him they added a fact check. Like a moderator editing a swear word or what have you.
But how much of a Trump loyalist do you have to be to give up your right?
Remember there will be a Democratic wanna be dictator in at some point and they will do the same. Remember Obama he would sign an executive order just like this using government to limit personal rights and business and that was bad but now it's good?
Better check again Dragman, they did censor Him last night.

Twitter promptly censored Trump’s tweet, saying it “violated the Twitter Rules about glorifying violence.”

Ya think they censor Antifa? Or BLM? Tweets floating out of M-SP by either of those?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/twitter-censors-trump-for-anti-riots-tweet-trump-fires-back
Meanwhile, someone posted on Twitter that the officer involved in Minneapolis was front row at a Trump rally in October that was blatantly false but Twitter did nothing about it...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,391 Posts
I think it's high time the legislature removed all special provisions of protection for all social media companies. They've had their special perks long enough and have abused their agreed mandate for far to long. They're simply another large business and should be able to play by the same rules other big business plays by and be legally accountable for their actions. When you think about it they're simply an entertainment business and produce nothing of real value for the country.
Twitter needs to go.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,336 Posts
I don't like Twitter and don't participate in it because I think it's basically a sewer. I think the Federal Government regulating speech is dangerous. Twitter applying standards only to the side they disagree with is dangerous. Both are violations of the First Amendment.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,048 Posts
Some immigrant rights organization posted a thing about rights being denied. I responded to the effect that "Legal immigrants" fine, illegal immigrants were criminals and should be treated as such. Facebook banned my post as I tried to post it. I appealed it as being against their community standards. I went to another site and then back and posted the exact same message word for word. The message was again denied and I appealed it. I went to another site again and then back, and I was able to post the message no problem, exactly the same. About two weeks later I got the responses to both of my appeals. One apologized and said I was free to post it if I still wanted to. The other upheld the decision that calling illegal immigrants criminals was devisive and against community standards.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,069 Posts
Heard on the news this morning that Trump has over 50000 tweets. Now I don't know if that is since he has been president or not. Either way that's alot.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,333 Posts
Some immigrant rights organization posted a thing about rights being denied. I responded to the effect that "Legal immigrants" fine, illegal immigrants were criminals and should be treated as such. Facebook banned my post as I tried to post it. I appealed it as being against their community standards. I went to another site and then back and posted the exact same message word for word. The message was again denied and I appealed it. I went to another site again and then back, and I was able to post the message no problem, exactly the same. About two weeks later I got the responses to both of my appeals. One apologized and said I was free to post it if I still wanted to. The other upheld the decision that calling illegal immigrants criminals was devisive and against community standards.
Try posting something that refers to peaceful protestors of the lockdown as “deplorable, rednecks, white supremacists, domestic terrorist, etc” and see if it gets taken down...
 
1 - 20 of 40 Posts
Top