Fairchild #17 said:
tdd said:
So my strong suspicion is you were a tad farther front than you wanted and you went through the shoulder blade. You've got enough penetration, and the good news is that you can't hit the shoulder blade solidly AND go over the lungs, so you're likely in a good spot with your placement.
I've got to disagree with you.
The majority of the shoulder blade sits high and forward of the lungs. It is more than likely if he tagged the shoulder blades he completely missed the vitals, especially at 34 yards where the angle of the angle flattens out.
If you are up in the shoulder blade area, your only real chance of killing that deer is by hitting the spinal cord and paralyzing him.
I typed a post in reply and it vanished, so I'll try this again.
I've made two major assumptions:
1- The spine wasn't hit (or the deer would be down)
2- That the OP's arrows are NOT super short. He describes the penetration as his fletches beinng 6" from the deer. So I'm gonna guess he's got a solid 11-12" of penetration, probably more. I'm assuming 4" fletch (plus 6" would be 10"), plus an inch for fletch to nock, so 11" out of the deer. That means even a 22" shaft (not much longer than a crossbow bolt) would have 11" of penetration, not counting the broadhead. A 28" shaft would have 17" of penetration. So my assumption is that he has enough penetration to go well past the mid-line and into the other side of the deer's body...i.e. not so shallow as to only reach on lung.
Now, given the OP states that there is a visible downward angle to the shot and the arrow in the deer reflects this, my view on this is that it would be VERY difficult to hit the shoulder blade solidly enough to halt penetration, yet miss the spine. And even if he did that somehow, with that much penetration, I just can't see how he didn't, in the least, hit the far lung. To me, that's the worst-case scenario for him. A one-lung hit is not a slam dunk in the least.
But with that much penetration and the shot being described "a little high," I am seeing this as a muc bigger chance his shot went through to the lungs than missing totally above everything. There is not a lot of shoulder ABOVE the spine. The scapula gets heavy and thick where it's going forward of the lungs, too, so I would be surprised to see that much penetration through the heavy "shank" of the scapula at 34 yards (stated shot distance). To blow through it readily, you need the thinner, flatter rear-most part.
I'm just seeing to many parts to this that don't add up for hitting above or in front of the lungs.
That's based on my own bowhunting experiences and butchering of a fair amount of whitetails.