The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,957 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I like to here from guys that may own both scopes
Nikon ProStaff 3x9x40
Bushnell trophy DOA 600
clarity sharpness
which would you say is the better scope?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,264 Posts
Bushnell, Why? I have always been or almost been high end scope guy. I've got 2 Ziess scopes 3x9x40 on .270 Ruger and .300rum Rem. Put a 5x15 Bushnell on a gun and couldn't say anything bad the scope is very clear and holds on target every time. It's a 3200. Liked it enough to buy another a 4200 6x24 same thing just as nice and also clear. I knocked them alot but no more I now just recently got a 4x12x40 xlt Trophy for my 22 mag and so far great. IMO some co. push a product hard and flood the market and that bothers me. Over the years favrite have been Leupold, Zeiss and now i can't wait to get a Trijicon just can't make up my mind on the gun and cal. I know Bushnell is an International Co. US,Canada,France,Australia, HongKong. Zeiss, Leupold, Unertl, Weaver, and some Burris are USA, Trijicon are made for U.S Gov. tact. and Law Enforcement. SO with all this said I'm not a fan of Nikon but to each his own...later
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top