That's exactly my point. I'm sorry Sir that you cannot hold your head where you would have liked to due to who has signed your paper. I would feel the same way. Thanks for your service.scottm2012 said:I retired, from the U.S. Army, with this loon as President. I have zero respect for him and I am ashamed that my Retirement Certificate is signed by him. I will never be able to hang it on my wall. That's the thanks I get for a 20+ year career.
wyomingcounty said:These folks have to call him "commander in chief"....I call him a lot of things, but commander-in-chief is not one of them.
This isn't your grand daddy's Regime, I mean administration, either. Get ready for the 3rd term! And no, it won't be based on votes. That's why the gun ban is so important to The Regime. If it wasn't for that pesky Constitution, the Regime would have banned firearm ownership outright for serfs, I mean citizens....then there would be no need for martial law....or something.TraskOutdoors said:The "explanation" for this doesn't really hold water either.
They are training for urban combat overseas? They have urban combat facilities on bases all over the country, they don't need to be rappelling onto rooftops in major cities all over the country.
And if the military is training for overseas missions, then why are all the law enforcement agencies training with them?
Look, I realize that it rubs a lot of people the wrong way to suggest that member of the military may fire upon their own citizens, especially those who have served. With all due respect, this isn't your daddy or grandad's military.