The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community banner

1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,796 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in firearms and other dangerous articles, further providing for sale or transfer of firearms; and providing for completion of forms.


http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/bill...pe=B&bn=775


Click on highest printer number for most current text. Use the other tabs to view action on this bill or see how people voted.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,796 Posts
Discussion Starter #2
This appears to be a very common sense bill.

The co-sponsor memo that was circulated explains it well:

MEMORANDUM


Posted: January 16, 2013 08:49 AM


From: Representative Seth Grove


To: All House members


Subject: Individual Firearm Rights (Former HB 251)
In the near future, I will reintroduce House Bill 251 from the 2011-2012 session <span style="font-weight: bold">to codify federal rules on accessibility to individual firearm rights under Pennsylvania law. </span>


This issue was raised during a licensed gun dealer seminar held by the Pennsylvania State Police, Firearms Bureau (PSP). A gun dealer asked the PSP representative if an applicant was allowed to get assistance in completing the required forms for the purchase of a firearm. The PSP representative applied a strict reading of the regulations (promulgated by the PSP) and stated the regulations do not permit another to complete the form and the applicant must do it alone.

A licensed gun dealer in my legislative district explained that the federal form (also required when transferring a firearm) makes specific accommodations for individuals who, for whatever reason, are unable to complete the ATF Form 4472. <span style="font-weight: bold">Given the obvious implications under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Constitutional problems associated with applying a “literacy test” to the exercise of a constitutional right,</span> I asked our staff to reach out to the PSP for clarification.

<span style="font-weight: bold">Though the PSP reconsidered their position and indicated it would be permissible for someone to get help, it does not appear any new, written guidance will be forthcoming for gun dealers who will be faced with an applicant that cannot complete the form alone.</span>

<span style="font-weight: bold">My legislation would adopt the procedure explained on the ATF Form 4472</span> – allowing another person to assist the applicant to complete the form and requiring two persons to witness the applicant’s answers and signature or mark. My bill would apply this procedure to both the application to purchase firearms and the application for a license to carry a concealed firearm.

Additionally, this bill would allow a gun dealer to record multiple firearms transferred in the same transaction on a single form. Unlike the ATF Form 4472, the PSP Form 4-113 (Application/Record of Sale) only allows for the transfer of one firearm on each form thus forcing the dealer and applicant to complete one form for each gun purchased. My language cuts down on the amount of time and paper the dealer and applicant use by consolidating the transfer of firearms into a single form.

Previous Cosponsors: Baker, Boyd, Caltagirone, D. Costa



http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legi...;cosponId=11041
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,796 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I am sure this discussion will morph into the illegal data base PSP maintains contrary to a PA Supreme Court ruling.

But the effort here should be <span style="text-decoration: underline">NOT</span> to muddy the water.

instead the effort here should be to take personal action with your State Rep to ensure they support this bill. Then to get other people to do the same by spreading the word about this bill.

Information is king. Making sure others not so involved or "connected" have this information AND ACT ON IT is the goal.

Muddying the water by bringing in all other issues, long not resolved, complicates passage of bills like this. We can have topical views and positions, but we need to have a singular view and corresponding actions on individual bills.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
Top