The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community banner

1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
369 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/epa-wil...e#axzz1jx535S8H

The federal government will begin testing water supplies for 61 homes in Dimock Twp. as soon as tomorrow in a dramatic expansion of the Environmental Protection Agency's current investigation into potential contamination of water supplies in the Susquehanna County village by natural gas drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Citing its authority under the federal Superfund Act, the EPA will also begin providing replacement drinking water supplies to four township homes where water tests taken by outside firms raised health concerns, the agency said.

The EPA said it has reached out to both the state Department of Environmental Protection and Cabot Oil and Gas Corp., the Marcellus Shale driller active in the area, to ask if they would be interested in working with the EPA as it collects data.

State regulators have found Cabot responsible for contaminating water supplies for 19 Dimock homes with methane from faulty gas wells.

Cabot halted bulk and bottled water deliveries to the homes on Dec. 1 after the state said the company had met the relevant terms of a December 2010 settlement over the contamination - including offering to install methane-removal systems that many residents have rejected saying they do not remove metals and other contaminants in their water.

Federal environmental regulators reopened their investigation of Dimock water wells in late December after declaring on Dec. 2 that the water posed no "immediate health threat." The agency reversed course after reviewing water test results released only after the agency's announcement.

Those tests, taken in August and September by a Cabot contractor, showed elevated levels of metals and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, a plasticizer commonly called DEHP. They also detected other chemicals including glycols, which are used in antifreeze, surfactants and 2-methoxyethanol, a solvent, in the drinking water wells.

Cabot denies it caused contamination in Dimock, which it says occurs naturally or can be attributed to other sources.

The EPA's water sampling will cover a broad array of chemicals and other constituents that may be in the water, with a focus on about a dozen parameters that have shown up in Dimock water wells.

The EPA said it wants to perform its own testing to fill "gaps" in the data gathered by Cabot, the state and other testing firms. The existing data do not all meet quality controls, the agency said, and some samples have been analyzed for parameters not studied elsewhere in the township.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,205 Posts
channel 16 just showed a fellow pulling a hose toward a house. Looked like the truck had a KY plate on it. Wonder why? Couldn't find anyone local?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
369 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I saw that as well. As the EPA isn't starting deliveries until Friday, I'd assume that is file footage from when Cabot was delivering water to those people.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,132 Posts
still don't get why the EPA feels they need to deliver water?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
369 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
probably has something to do with the 7th paragraph from the Time's article:

Those tests, taken in August and September by a Cabot contractor, showed elevated levels of metals and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, a plasticizer commonly called DEHP. They also detected other chemicals including glycols, which are used in antifreeze, surfactants and 2-methoxyethanol, a solvent, in the drinking water wells.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,132 Posts
i would guess the second paragraph


Citing its authority under the federal Superfund Act, the EPA will also begin providing replacement drinking water supplies to four township homes where water tests taken by outside firms raised health concerns, the agency said.


lets hope they can prove where the chemicals came from, or where they didnt come from.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
463 Posts
So the epa says that if this is delayed the people CAN drink from their water wells? Section VI.

One again, the feds inserting themselves politically when the state answer isn't what the anti drilling faction wants to hear.

I hope that if the epa determines it is not from drilling (like that might happen
) then the residents should have to pay for remediation. They should have to reimburse for false claims also.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,132 Posts
1trueamerican said:
So the epa says that if this is delayed the people CAN drink from their water wells? Section VI.

One again, the feds inserting themselves politically when the state answer isn't what the anti drilling faction wants to hear.

I hope that if the epa determines it is not from drilling (like that might happen
) then the residents should have to pay for remediation. They should have to reimburse for false claims also.



i agree with that 100%. if they find out those people are making false claims, they should be forced to pay.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,753 Posts
Same Lisa Jackson who stopped the bear hunt in NJ despite overhelming evidence presented by the Fish & Game Commission. All politics,,all the time.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
369 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
1trueamerican said:
So the epa says that if this is delayed the people CAN drink from their water wells? Section VI.

Section VI states:
If no action is taken, the residents may utilize well water which poses a potential health concern.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top