HB 1684 Guaranteed Minimum Royalty - The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old 09-17-2013, 10:28 AM Thread Starter
Sage
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Franklin County
Posts: 24,796
Back To Top
HB 1684 Guaranteed Minimum Royalty

Short Title:

An Act amending the act of July 20, 1979 (P.L.183, No.60), known as the Oil and Gas Lease Act, prohibiting certain deductions from royalties.

Prime Sponsor: Representative EVERETT

Last Action: Referred to ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY, Sept. 16, 2013 [House]


Memo: Guaranteed Minimum Royalty Act (Act 60 of 1979)



http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/bill...e=B&bn=1684

Is your position a short term gain - or a long term loss? Separate the issues.
Bluetick is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old 09-17-2013, 10:28 AM Thread Starter
Sage
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Franklin County
Posts: 24,796
Back To Top
Re: HB 1684 Guaranteed Minimum Royalty

MEMORANDUM



Posted:

June 28, 2013 02:45 PM



From:

Representative Garth Everett and Rep. Matthew Baker, Rep. Sandra Major, Rep. Tina Pickett



To:

All House members



Subject:

Guaranteed Minimum Royalty Act (Act 60 of 1979)




As you may know, our Guaranteed Minimum Royalty Act (Act 60 of 1979) provides royalty owners with a guaranteed minimum one-eighth royalty for oil, natural gas or gas of any other designation in order to protect landowners from unfair or deceptive leases for the recovery of these natural resources. The development of unconventional shale gas wells in the Commonwealth has been accompanied by an effort by some companies to reduce royalties below the statutory minimum by transferring post-production costs to royalty owners. These are costs that are incurred between the wellhead and a final market point of sale and typically include dehydration and transportation. When these expenses are deducted, final payments often result in royalty shares of less than one-eighth.

In 2010, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered this issue in Kilmer v. Elexco Land Services, Inc. and determined that the “General Assembly is the branch of government best suited to weigh the public policies underlying the determination of the proper point of royalty valuation.” When PA landowners signed leases stating that they would receive one-eighth of the value of the gas produced, they assumed that an eighth is an eighth – not something significantly less than that because of deductions. Accordingly, we believe it is within the legitimate police power of the Commonwealth to address and clarify this issue for our royalty owners, gas developers and the Courts.

Therefore, in the near future, Representatives Baker, Major, Pickett and I will introduce legislation to clarify that the deduction of post-production costs from unconventional wells may not result in royalty payments less than the guaranteed minimum.

http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legi...;cosponId=13074

Is your position a short term gain - or a long term loss? Separate the issues.
Bluetick is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome