Cabot, Dimock families near settlement - The Outdoor Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old 08-15-2012, 12:19 PM Thread Starter
Hooked on HuntingPa
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nepa
Posts: 369
Back To Top
Cabot, Dimock families near settlement

Cabot, Dimock families near settlement on gas drilling contamination
By Laura Legere (Staff Writer)
Published: August 15, 2012

A high-profile and often bitter lawsuit brought by three dozen Dimock Twp. families against Cabot Oil and Gas Corp. is nearing a settlement for several residents who allege natural gas drilling contamination harmed their health and property, according to court papers filed in federal court late Monday.

The amended motion filed by attorneys for the residents identifies the settling plaintiffs, but the names have been redacted. The settlement amounts and terms are not disclosed.

The main purpose of the new court filing is to create a fund to distribute settlement money, but the document details some conditions of the otherwise confidential agreement. Cabot submitted the offers in May and June, and the settling families were required to sign a broad release "outlining the terms of the settlement and requiring complete confidentiality" about its content, according to the filing.

The sides aim to complete the settlement process for the families that have signed off on it within 60 days, according to the motion. As settlement money is paid to each family, its case will be dismissed.

The motion Monday follows earlier public signals that the two sides were close to an agreement.

In a conference call with investors on July 25, Cabot CEO Dan O. Dinges said the company had reached verbal settlement agreements with 32 of 36 Dimock households and was continuing to negotiate with the remaining families.

Mr. Dinges said during the call that the value of the settlements "are not a material item with respect to Cabot's financial statements."

Both the families' attorney, Tate J. Kunkle, of the New York-based law firm Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, and Cabot spokesman George Stark declined to comment on Tuesday.

Victoria Switzer, who has been a vocal critic of Cabot's operations in Dimock, made a brief statement for her family.

"We are relieved to put this behind us and hopeful that we will be able to live out our lives in the home we have invested so much of our time and resources in," she said. "I would advise anyone living in a gas field with concerns or disputes involving a gas company to try to work with them."

Some residents said they plan to push on with the case.

"I'll see you in court," said Ray Kemble, who did not sign the settlement agreement because he said he dislikes terms set by both his attorneys and Cabot's.

The agreement would limit what he can say publicly, he said, adding that of the 40 protest signs he has posted on his property, his attorney told him the only one he would have to take down "is the one big one out there that says, Make Cabot Pay."

Mr. Kemble said the settlement would also dissolve portions of a December 2010 settlement reached between Cabot and the state that required the driller to offer 19 families affected by methane contamination twice the assessed value of their homes and a treatment system to remove the gas from their water. Most of the families in the lawsuit did not take the money or the treatment systems.

"That is no longer on the table," said Mr. Kemble, who makes daily drinking water deliveries to families who were once provided with bulk and bottled water by Cabot or, more recently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The families sued Cabot in November 2009, nearly 11 months after a blast that first drew regulators' attention to flaws in Cabot's wells blew the concrete cover off a water well at the home of Norma Fiorentino, the first named plaintiff in the case.

Although Cabot settled with the state over methane contamination in water wells connected to 19 Dimock homes, it denies it polluted township water supplies with gas or other substances. A six-month water sampling effort by the EPA ended last month with the agency declaring that arsenic, barium or manganese in five water wells could be safely treated and no further action in Dimock was necessary.

Contact the writer: [email protected]
g17 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old 08-15-2012, 01:52 PM
DennyF's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cumberland County 5A
Posts: 25,074
Back To Top
Re: Cabot, Dimock families near settlement

Legal settlements can be "funny things".

In many cases it is the <span style="font-style: italic">defendants</span>' insurance carriers' attorneys that push for settlements. If the insurance company is found to be responsible for paying damages, if any, then they prefer to just settle, as it is generally the less expensive option.

Likewise, plaintiff's attorneys also tend to prefer settlements, because a settlement is a "sure thing", as opposed to going to court and taking a chance that their clients may lose? In which case, all they'll get are fees and cost associated with pressing the case, not a healthy percentage of the "take", should a settlement be offered.

Some years ago friends of mine were sued, because their lab ran across the street to welcome kids getting off the schoolbus. The lab knocked one girl down on a neighbor's lawn, along with maybe one or two other kids. No one was hurt, the kids all laughed and that was that.

Until one neighbor down the street filed a suit some weeks later, alleging their 10 year old daughter had been injured by the dog.

Up until the suit was filed, the daughter showed no signs of any injury and in fact had participated in twice-weekly gym classes. My friend's wife (who also owned the lab), was the middle school gym teacher, so she knew the kid hadn't been injured, as did everyone else at school and in the neighborhood.

Long story short, the dog owners' insurance company demanded they sign-off on a settlement with a $10K payout. They refused, it went to court and the plaintiffs received $5K, which they had to share with their attorney, who was the one who had come up with the $10K settlement proposal.

Settlements are like plea bargains in today's legal system: Generally the easy way out for both sides.

Some folks' learnin' curves just look like circles...3A Camp/also hunt 4B
DennyF is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old 08-15-2012, 10:47 PM Thread Starter
Hooked on HuntingPa
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nepa
Posts: 369
Back To Top
Re: Cabot, Dimock families near settlement

The thing I find baffling on this story is there were 18 families involved in litigation. Of that number, 7 accepted the dep/cabot COA leaving 11 families in litigation with Cabot. When and why did that number grow to 36 families as is referenced in the above article?
g17 is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Outdoor Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome