Dimock Supervisors under fire - The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-06-2012, 01:46 PM Thread Starter
g17
Hooked on HuntingPa
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nepa
Posts: 369
Back To Top
Dimock Supervisors under fire

http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-dri...e#axzz1iPhnQNdN

A Dimock Township couple has filed a series of private criminal complaints against the supervisors, saying the elected leaders held a secret meeting last month.

The Susquehanna County District Attorney says he has received the complaints and is now in the process of reviewing them to determine if they have merit.

http://pahomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=219626

Supervisor Paul Jennings told us Tuesday night, there was never a secret meeting.

http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-dri...e#axzz1iPhnQNdN

Board Chairman Matthew Neenan said he could not comment in depth on Mrs. Sautner's complaint because the supervisors had not been served official papers. He did say he believes the supervisors did nothing wrong during the Dec. 2 meeting with some residents who came looking for information.

"We voted on nothing," Mr. Neenan said of the meeting.
g17 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-08-2012, 03:34 PM
The Man
 
buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bradford County
Posts: 8,129
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

It concerns some resident's of Dimock, who don't want to foot any legal bills. "My husband makes 14 dollars an hour and I raise three kids on that and I have to raise my taxes to pay for your crap," said one unidentified woman.

........

DIMOCK TWP. - Deep divisions among neighbors over the impact of Marcellus Shale drilling on this Susquehanna County community erupted Tuesday night
...................

Cabot has denied that it caused the methane contamination, which it says occurs naturally in 80 percent of the water wells it has tested throughout Susquehanna County.
............................



seems like the nieghbors dont agree, and as i recall a lot of them say the gas was in the wells in that area before cabot was there.doesnt look to good when there own nieghbors dont believe them about there wells?
cabot says 80% of the wells they test in that county have methane in them pre drilling? i would think that would be a good place for EPA/DEP to follow that up. might shed some light on whats truely going on in dimock ?

far as the supervisors, as a twp supervisor myself, i think they did the right thing not taking water from bing. i dont the the twp should get involved with that, just as there soliciter pointed out.
in my opinion the whole water from bing was nothing more than a dog and pony show from the anti's anyway, which is even better reason for the twp to steer clear of it.

while i cant say the supervisors did or didnt do anything wrong, because i was not there, i will say that supervisors can be in the same place at the same time and listen to peoples complaints,comments, thoughts etc, they just cant make decisions about twp business.
it doesnt sound like they did anything wrong, they seem confident they didnt and they no the laws, sis i believe they will be cleared......time will tell.

Your never to old to learn something stupid
buzz is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-08-2012, 05:24 PM Thread Starter
g17
Hooked on HuntingPa
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nepa
Posts: 369
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by buzz
while i cant say the supervisors did or didnt do anything wrong, because i was not there, i will say that supervisors can be in the same place at the same time and listen to peoples complaints,comments, thoughts etc, they just cant make decisions about twp business.
it doesnt sound like they did anything wrong, they seem confident they didnt and they no the laws, sis i believe they will be cleared......time will tell.
I think it all comes down to whether or not they held a "meeting". Ones says no, the other says they did. If it was a "meeting", shouldn't there have been public notice given ahead of time?

Personally, I don't think the whole story is out yet. Just seems odd that 20 or 30 people show up with no public notice given. I agree.. time will tell, although at this point.. I dont' think it looks very good for the supervisors as they have stated they did indeed discuss the proposed mutual aid agreement.

"Any time a quorum or more discusses agency business, it must do so at a public meeting unless an exception applies," Melewsky said. "And I'm not aware of an exception that applies to allow this type of discussion."

http://www.theithacajournal.com/article/...ion-water-offer
g17 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-08-2012, 06:46 PM
The Man
 
buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bradford County
Posts: 8,129
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

fine line with that. i'll give you a example. we meet with pen dot to set up agility program, 2 and sometimes all 3 supervisors are there. we ask questions, listen,learn what we can do. then at our monthly meeting, we first give a discloser stating we met with pendot, time/date and names, then we discuss what we learned, make a decision and go forward.

ok to have a meeting like that, just a fine line with what you do and say while your there. i thik it's fine for all of them to attend the same meeting, long as they didnt call the meeting without public notice, or debate/decide on twp business.

you have to give enough room with that law to allow the normal function of business.

Your never to old to learn something stupid
buzz is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-08-2012, 07:17 PM Thread Starter
g17
Hooked on HuntingPa
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nepa
Posts: 369
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

***ok to have a meeting like that, just a fine line with what you do and say while your there. i thik it's fine for all of them to attend the same meeting, long as they didnt call the meeting without public notice****

There was no public notice given for the meeting on the December 2nd.

***or debate/decide on twp business.***

According to the Supervisors, they did discuss twp business (the proposed mutual aid agreement with Bing).

***you have to give enough room with that law to allow the normal function of business.***

The act itself, contains plenty of exemptions for allowing normal routine of business. If it is lacking in some way, it should be amended. The law is the law, it's there for a reason, trying to find wiggle room around it seems fishy to me.
g17 is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-08-2012, 07:36 PM
The Man
 
buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bradford County
Posts: 8,129
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

if the supervisors didnt call/orginize the meeting, they dont have to give notice.

you can discuss,as in learning facts.

i agree that the law is there for a reason. i'm not sure if they are wiggling around it cause i wasnt there and there is not enough printed to fully understand how it all went down.


keep us posted on the outcome of this. lot of gray area involved , i'm sure the investigation will get to the bottom.

Your never to old to learn something stupid
buzz is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-08-2012, 07:43 PM Thread Starter
g17
Hooked on HuntingPa
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nepa
Posts: 369
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

Agreed, should be interesting to see how this progresses.
Right now I'm calling a meeting with Sam Adams to watch the Steelers game!
g17 is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 12:04 AM
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Central PA 2G
Posts: 2,197
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

how'd that turn out for you, GB all the way !
47studebaker is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 12:36 AM Thread Starter
g17
Hooked on HuntingPa
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nepa
Posts: 369
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

Went about how I expected it. The Beer was cold, Denver was Hot.
One of my best friends is a diehard Packers fan, I prefer the Steelers. Last year the bet for the Superbowl was loser had to display a piece of the other teams memorabilia in the living room for a year. Darn tired of that GB #1 Fan license plate LOL, but a bets a bet and it's almost paid up
g17 is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old 01-13-2012, 08:44 PM Thread Starter
g17
Hooked on HuntingPa
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nepa
Posts: 369
Back To Top
Re: Dimock Supervisors under fire

http://www.pressconnects.com/article/201...dyssey=nav|head

DIMOCK, Pa. -- An unannounced gathering of all three Dimock Township supervisors last month "arguably" constituted a violation of Pennsylvania's open meetings laws, according to a decision issued Wednesday by Susquehanna County District Attorney Jason Legg.

"If the media reports are accurate, it appears that there was some informal gathering of the Dimock Township Supervisors where township business was discussed ..." Legg wrote in a four-page decision. "If true, this would arguably constitute a violation of the Sunshine Act."

In his decision this week, Legg admonished the Dimock officials for procedural "impropriety."

However, he said the district attorney's office wouldn't pursue the matter further.
g17 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome