Economic Impact of Shale Development - The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-30-2011, 05:00 PM Thread Starter
Sage
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 2A, 2B
Posts: 21,381
Back To Top
Economic Impact of Shale Development

Penn State study shows more modest economic impact from shale gas


By Laura Legere (Staff Writer)

Published: August 30, 2011


•Penn State study shows more modest economic impact from
Marcellus Shale


A new Penn State study of the economic impacts of the Marcellus Shale has found that Pennsylvania natural gas development in 2009 created roughly half the jobs and economic activity reported in earlier, industry-financed studies.

The more modest findings were reported Monday by researchers at the Pennsylvania College of Technology and Penn State Cooperative Extension.

The study, which examined not only how much money Marcellus Shale drillers spend on wages, leasing and royalty payments in Pennsylvania but also where and how those dollars are spent, found that "a significant portion" of the money left the community where the land was leased or was not spent in the year it was earned. Previous economic studies did not consider those factors and instead "assumed that all the dollars accrue to Pennsylvania households and are spent like normal income," the authors wrote.

Because of that, the number of jobs supported by the industry - about 23,000 in 2009 - is smaller than earlier estimates, Penn State researchers wrote. The total economic activity generated by the industry that year is also smaller: $3.1 billion.

A 2010 study by other Penn State researchers and funded by the Marcellus Shale Coalition estimated that the industry supported about 44,000 jobs and generated more than $7.17 billion in economic activity in 2009.

"Our results confirm that where leasing and royalty dollars are going significantly influences the estimated overall impacts," said Timothy Kelsey, Ph.D., a professor of agricultural economics at Penn State and a lead author of the study.

Although the authors noted that mineral rights ownership is often separate from surface ownership and is nearly impossible to study, they looked at property ownership in counties with Marcellus activity and found that only about half the land is owned by residents who also live in those counties. A quarter is owned by Pennsylvania residents who live elsewhere in the state, about 8 percent is owned by residents of other states and about 17 percent is publicly owned.

"This would imply that a large portion of the economic benefits immediately leaves the communities being impacted by drilling," Dr. Kelsey said.

The Penn State researchers detailed other notable findings, including:

- Landowners save or invest about 55 percent of leasing bonus payments and about 66 percent of royalty payments instead of spending them immediately, according to surveys.

- 28 percent of business in Bradford and Washington counties that responded to surveys said their sales had increased because of the gas development and only 3 percent reported a decline in sales.

- And only 18 percent of municipalities directly experiencing drilling activities in the most active Marcellus counties said their tax revenues had increased, while 26 percent of the local governments indicated that their costs had increased.

"This confirms that considering both revenues and costs is critical for having a complete understanding of the impacts of Marcellus Shale," the authors wrote. "These findings from local officials contrast with prior economic studies which predicted that there would be large local tax impacts, but which did not verify what is actually occurring."

David Kay, a senior extension associate with Cornell University's Community and Rural Development Institute who has studied past Marcellus economic impact studies, called the new report "the most careful study of the issue that's been done to date" using a common analytical tool called an input-output model.

The researchers did "a lot of empirical, on-the-ground survey work," he said. "They still had to make a lot of assumptions, but they had to make many fewer assumptions than were made in many of the other studies."

Kathryn Klaber, president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, pointed to the study's shortcomings, calling it "far from complete and based on years-old data," but said it "illustrates the Marcellus Shale's growing economic strength."

Sharon Ward, director of the liberal-leaning Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center, welcomed the report, which she said "offers a better assessment of the economic effects and contemplates the uncompensated costs to paint a fuller picture of the role of gas drilling to the state's economy."

She added that although the report does not address the issue of a statewide drilling tax - a tax the center supports - it "makes the case" for such a tax by alluding to "a lack of direct revenue to local governments, plus human, health, and environment impacts."

"The report makes clear that gas drilling brings additional wealth to leaseholders," she said, "but that it also brings additional headaches, and costs, to municipal officials struggling with gas-related impacts for which many receive no offsetting tax income."

Contact the writer: [email protected]

The man who really counts in the world is the doer, not the mere critic. ~Roosevelt
Guest3 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-30-2011, 05:29 PM
Diehard Outdoorsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Westmoreland
Posts: 3,581
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

Yes. Shocking isn't it? Yawn.....stretch. All of those academic post about how well it will do for Pennsylvania and how a severance tax will make the State bleed.

When half...if not more of the monies go outside of Pa.

Could have knocked me over with 40,000lbs of MS fracking water in a bucket.

SW
Sethwood is offline  
post #3 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-30-2011, 06:20 PM
The Man
 
buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bradford County
Posts: 8,129
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

found that "a significant portion" of the money left the community where the land was leased or was not spent in the year it was earned. Previous economic studies did not consider those factors and instead "assumed that all the dollars accrue to Pennsylvania households and are spent like normal income,"


Although the authors noted that mineral rights ownership is often separate from surface ownership and is nearly impossible to study, they looked at property ownership in counties with Marcellus activity and found that only about half the land is owned by residents who also live in those counties. A quarter is owned by Pennsylvania residents who live elsewhere in the state, about 8 percent is owned by residents of other states and about 17 percent is publicly owned.


doesnt say the money left the state, says it left the comunity.

this study says it still put 3.1 billion into economy. just points out that people didnt spend all the lease money in the first year they recieved it. people are putting lease and royalty money into investments so they can retire, at which time a portion of that money will be spent. as more royalty money goes out to more people , more will be spent , further boosting our economy.

Your never to old to learn something stupid
buzz is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-30-2011, 06:37 PM
Hooked on HuntingPa
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SW Pa
Posts: 283
Send a message via AIM to TributeArcher
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

I am with Buzz on this one...Farmers havent had money in years, sorry they dont just go and blow it rediculously as soon as their "WELL-fare" checks come in... Farmers were responsible back when they had little money and even more responsible now... The money that companies are shelling out right now for shale gas development will make it into the governments hands soon enough.

And as for the severence tax, simply not needed. The state and federal government is taking their fair share when they tax the mineral right owners for income tax...

Anyone that feels that another tax should be imposed obviously is looking for a free handout on the backs of a thriving industry.....

"In the struggle for survival, the fittest win out at the expense of their rivals."
-Charles Darwin
TributeArcher is offline  
post #5 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-30-2011, 08:21 PM
Diehard Outdoorsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Westmoreland
Posts: 3,581
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

So.....now where are the arguments about how the rural monies go back to the big cities and they don't stay in the rural communities where the monies come from?

Suddenly now it's OK if "most" of it stays in Pa.?

Oh...and I think the majority of the employment are from out of State companies. A small amount of permanent new Pa. jobs have been or will be created here.

Our cup runneth over.
Sethwood is offline  
post #6 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-30-2011, 08:36 PM
Sage
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 24,360
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

The rural monies go to the State in the form of income tax on leases and royalties.... and the State spends it where??? Back in the community from whence it came...

Local m unicpalities do not have an income tax or sales tax so I doubt they will get a huge increase if any in tax receipts...

No mention of any increase in State tax collecte?? Fuel tax? Sales tax? Probably just an oversight...


wmu 3A
timberdoodle is offline  
post #7 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 12:55 AM
Diehard Outdoorsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Westmoreland
Posts: 3,581
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

Quote:
Originally Posted by timberdoodle
The rural monies go to the State in the form of income tax on leases and royalties.... and the State spends it where??? Back in the community from whence it came...
The State gets a whopping 3.1% on the NET (after cost) of the lease and the royalties (including that fabricated percentage of depletion deduction). Then the State allocates it's Revenues Statewide based primarily on population. I don't know if you gleaned that from my initial post.....but that's what I ment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timberdoodle
Local m unicpalities do not have an income tax or sales tax so I doubt they will get a huge increase if any in tax receipts...
Local Muni's get nothing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timberdoodle
No mention of any increase in State tax collecte?? Fuel tax? Sales tax? Probably just an oversight...
Increase in Fuel tax for what? Increase in Sales tax for what? Probably just not knowing the law.

SW
Sethwood is offline  
post #8 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 01:13 AM
Sage
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 24,360
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

sorry but the State income tax is a flat tax no deductions.... You pay State tax on what you pay in Federal tax..so do leases and people who receive royalty

The increase in fuel tax collected comes from the enormous increase in truck traffic due to the gas play...The increase in sales taxes cxollected come from the increase in working population spending here..

wmu 3A
timberdoodle is offline  
post #9 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 11:53 AM
The Man
 
buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bradford County
Posts: 8,129
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

our local munci is getting around 300k worth of road work done by the gas comps.....our total budget is around 280k for the year.
some of theese are roads that gas comps have damaged (not ruined), others are roads they want to use in future and they are fixing ahead of time. all the roads they are working on are getting improvements to hold the truck traffic, which makes them better than they were before.

with the work they have proposed for next year, they will easly double that.

fuel tax is built into the price at the pump. diesel is about $.38 per gallon. each truck on the road must pay a 2290 highway use tax before you can get a plate for it, that is $550 for a tractor.
the cost of a license plate for trucks was raised to about $1650 (can vary with ifta states) to add money for road repair.

now add up the number of trucks doing this work, the fuel burned every day, etc...etc.
it is a huge increase in FUEL TAX REVENUE.

CHK alone has over 300 water trucks working for them. that is one gas comp, and just the water trucks, not dump trucks, equipment hauling, etc..etc.


lets see, just chk water trucks. one small piece of what going on

300 trucks
100 gal fuel a day
$38 tax per truck
38 x 300= #11,400 a day
$11,400 x 320 working day= $3,648,000

$3,648,000 in fuel tax useing conservative numbers, and only figuring one comps water trucks.
this is revenue that would not be there without gas, it is not shifted from one type of hauling to another. without gas, those trucks would not be on the roads in PA as there is not other work for them.

now if you take those numbers and multiply it across the the several thousand trucks working state wide in this industry, it adds up to a LOT OF TAX REVENUE, just off fuel tax. add to that the fact the gas comps are bonding and fixing the roads they are useing so the expense of fixing them does not lie on local munci or the state.

Your never to old to learn something stupid
buzz is offline  
post #10 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 06:34 PM
Diehard Outdoorsman
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: West Hempfield, PA
Posts: 3,209
Back To Top
Re: Economic Impact of Shale Development

Several of these companies have built regional headquarters in SW PA as well adding to property tax roles, income taxes, etc. in addition to the construction activity required to build the new headquarters.

Sure, a lot of the initial white collar jobs and experienced field workers came from out of state but the majority of them relocated and changed residency when that happened and the munis and state are seeing an increase in tax receipts just from that. Additionally, as the work continues to ramp up, locals are being hired and trained to do these jobs.

Also, seamless pipe manufacturers and coaters are expanding to keep up with the pipe/casing demand (not to mention the addition of rail, trucking and storage yard employment to keep up with this demand). What about all the local equipment operators needed to work on well pads, grading, logging, pipeline clearing....

There are 1000's of ancillary jobs created with this work.

Now, I do agree, PA needs a middle of the road extraction tax and I am disappointed in Corbett for not pushing for one.

Suburban redneck.
justgrad25 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome