NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands - The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 11-30-2011, 01:10 PM Thread Starter
Administrator
 
casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: milford pa-pike county
Posts: 13,493
Back To Top
NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands



By JEFF SISTRUNK

[email protected]

TRENTON -- The fate of this year's black bear hunt is now in the hands of a three-judge appeals panel.

An attorney for a pair of animal protection groups argued Tuesday before an appeals court in Trenton for the cancellation of this year's planned six-day black bear hunt, which is slated to begin Monday, on the grounds that the state Department of Environmental Protection's 2010 Comprehensive Black Bear Management Policy is flawed. The groups also want the policy declared invalid.

Meanwhile, attorneys for the DEP and a state sportsman's organization sought to discredit the groups' arguments.

A decision is expected before the first day of the hunt. An appeal to the state Supreme Court is possible.

"A bear hunt can't take place without a proper management policy, and a flawed policy can't be allowed to stand even on an interim basis," said Doris Lin, the animal protection groups' attorney, during her presentation to the appeals court.

The appellants, the Animal Protection League of New Jersey and the Bear Education Resource Group, failed to stop last year's hunt in court, but a judge allowed the lawsuit to continue. A total of 592 bears were taken during the 2010 hunt.

Chief among Lin's allegations was that the DEP presented misleading or inaccurate data to provide grounds for the hunt, which the agency includes in its bear management policy with the stated purpose of controlling and protecting New Jersey's bear population. Among other things, Lin said, the DEP gathered bear complaint reports from many more police departments in 2009 than in 2007, which greatly inflated the number of complaints. The number of bear complaints reported by the state rose in the years from 2007 to 2009, but Lin said that's because data was being collected from 32 police departments in 2009 but just 17 departments two years earlier.

"The department has acknowledged that it has drawn from more police departments than in the past," said Deputy Attorney General Dean Jablonski, who represented the DEP. "That is part of an effort to obtain the best data possible."

On rebuttal, Lin acknowledged Jablonski's remark but said that "what the council can't do is compare the new data to the old data."

The estimated bear population increased significantly in the years following the 2005 bear hunt, Lin said, which would indicate the hunt is an ineffective population control method.

"The department's data does show a dramatic increase in the bear population," Jablonski said. "That is the reason a regular hunt needs to be part of the Comprehensive Black Bear Management Policy."

Bears have been spotted in 19 of 21 counties this year. The DEP has recorded 2,667 reports of bear activity through October, a number that includes bear sightings, attacks on livestock, 46 home entries and 516 reports of bears picking through garbage.

Lin raised concerns that pregnant bears are not protected in the hunt and said the DEP has been inconsistent in its statements on the issue.

Jablonski said the number of pregnant females taken in past hunts has been minimal. However, he said, the safety of such bears is not guaranteed.

"The department has not represented that all pregnant bears will be protected," he said.

Lin also accused the DEP of violating the Administrative Procedure Act, the law that governs how administrative agencies formulate regulations, by disregarding many concerns brought by the public. About 9,000 public comments were submitted to the DEP prior to the agency's finalization of the 2010 bear management policy.

"The DEP provided disingenuous answers, responses to many public comments," Lin said. For example, she said, one commenter expressed concern that bear complaints may go up because of the DEP's educational efforts. That comment did not receive a response, Lin said.

Jablonski replied that "the disagreement of commenters with the policy does not make the agency's responses disingenuous," adding that agencies need not reply to each individual comment.

Judge Philip Carchman pointed out that the appellants' argument was that certain comments were not addressed at all.

"The agency responded to each substantive argument raised," Jablonski said.

Anna Seidman, attorney for the New Jersey State Federation of Sportman's Clubs Inc., an intervening party in the case, said the animal protection groups' accusations that the DEP's policy is scientifically flawed and that the department violated the Administrative Procedure Act are secondary to the groups' philosophical opposition to hunting.

"People who don't understand hunting -- like the bear groups -- can't comprehend that any activity involving the taking of wildlife can be an effective game species management tool," Seidman said. "They don't understand that hunters are interested in preserving wildlife populations."

Carchman implied that the appeals panel was unconcerned with any matters of philosophy.

"Can we take the hunting element out of it, and look at the appellants' arguments to determine whether the agency had sufficient grounds to implement the plan?" Carchman said in a rhetorical fashion.

"I think then you have to make an assessment as to whether the data supported the bear management policy," Seidman said.

The hunt is held concurrently with the firearm deer season. Bear hunting is allowed in the northwestern part of the state, north of Interstate 78 and west of Interstate 287.

Besides a hunt, the Comprehensive Black Bear Management Policy developed by the Division of Fish and Wildlife includes education, a bear feeding ban and aversive conditioning.

The New Jersey Sierra Club is also opposed to the hunt, with the main reason being if New Jersey put in place a strong Bear Management Plan instead of the proposed plan a hunt would not have to take place, said Jeff Tittel, Sierra Club director. Created: 11/29/2011 | Updated: 11/30/2011


http://www.njherald.com/story/news/b...11-30-2011-web
casey is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 11-30-2011, 01:15 PM Thread Starter
Administrator
 
casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: milford pa-pike county
Posts: 13,493
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

This is the NJF&G Comprehensive Policy

http://www.njfishandwildlife.com/bearpolicy10.htm
casey is online now  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-01-2011, 06:50 PM
Senior Member
 
PADingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Effort ,PA
Posts: 13,867
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

Just heard its on.....

Quote:
In an opinion handed down in state Superior Court, Judge Philip S. Carchman wrote that New Jersey's bear management plan is "based on sufficient evidence," allowing the hunt to continue.

In Memory of LCPL Ralph Fabbri 9/29/89-9/28/10
Semper Fi, Brother
Never forget!
PADingo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-01-2011, 11:29 PM
Administrator
 
DIYASUB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NORTHERN NEW YORK STATE
Posts: 26,426
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

Good! There's no place for antis in wildlife management!

.
MAGA 2020
DIYASUB is online now  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-02-2011, 02:34 AM Thread Starter
Administrator
 
casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: milford pa-pike county
Posts: 13,493
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

A state court has upheld the validity of the state's Comprehensive Black Bear Management Policy (CBBMP). The ruling today by the Appellate Division of state Superior Court clears the way for the week-long bear hunt starting on Monday, Dec. 5.

The three-judge panel rejected arguments made by the New Jersey Animal Protection League and the Bear Education and Resource Group contending the DEP and State Fish and Game Council acted arbitrarily and/or in bad faith in creating the CBBMP, which includes an annual bear hunt as part of the integrated plan to deal with the state's black bear population.

The bear hunt will run through Saturday, Dec. 10, to be held concurrently with the Six-day Firearm Deer Season. Bear hunting zones include large sections of Morris, Sussex, Warren, and northern Passaic counties, plus smaller areas of Hunterdon, Somerset and Bergen counties. There is a limit of one bear per licensed and registered hunter.

To view the DEP news release about the ruling visit http://www.nj.gov/dep/newsrel/2011/11_0135.htm ; for information about the 2011 black bear hunting season visit http://www.njfishandwildlife.com/bearseason_info.htm on the Division of Fish and Wildlife website.
casey is online now  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-02-2011, 11:23 AM
Sage
 
Woods walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,679
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

This really is good news for NJ. When the antis have no grounds to sue to stop a season they sue on the grounds that the management plan is flawed or does not exist. The court acknowledging that NJ's management plan is valid and acceptable pretty much closes down the antis for stopping bear seasons in the future.




When you are up to your butt in alligators, it is hard to remember your intent was to drain the swamp. Stay focused!
Woods walker is online now  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-02-2011, 08:12 PM
Administrator
 
DIYASUB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NORTHERN NEW YORK STATE
Posts: 26,426
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

While I agree that knocking down the antis on the bear hunting issue is an excellent thing, we mustnt forget that their real goal is to stop all hunting and that they consider every issue to be a chance to get their foot in the door, no matter what state they're flexing their muscles in.

.
MAGA 2020
DIYASUB is online now  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-02-2011, 08:14 PM
Sage
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 24,367
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

I'm heartened to see the anti's find bear hunting so appealing!

wmu 3A
timberdoodle is online now  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-02-2011, 10:01 PM
Sage
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Franklin County
Posts: 24,796
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

They surely ran into the same issue Unified did in PA in lawsuit one, two and to a lesser degree three. That is, academic / scientific standards need to be met for the study or proposal to be sound. Disagreeing with the study or proposal because you don't like the idea or plan doesn't make the plan wrong.

Is your position a short term gain - or a long term loss? Separate the issues.
Bluetick is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 12-02-2011, 10:32 PM
Sage
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 24,367
Back To Top
Re: NJ Bear hunt in appeals court judges' hands

It also helps to have DEP Commissioner and Governor who supports the work and findings of Fish& Game.

wmu 3A
timberdoodle is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome