Completely different results from 2009 - The Outdoor Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 12-03-2010, 10:53 PM Thread Starter
The Man
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 9,145
Back To Top
Completely different results from 2009

Some of you may remember how last year I shot a doe with my .30-06 with handloads consisting of 168 gr TTSX's over 49 grains of IMR 4064. I posted about how I was disappointed in the extreme amount of damage that was done even though I didn't hit any major bone structure, just ribs. To sum it up, the whole front half of the doe was bloodshot and mostly un-usuable. She also ran over 100 yards and the lungs only had a small hole punched through them.

Being that it was the first deer I'd shot with that load (which was designed for elk), I didn't want to base my entire opinion of them as a whitetail round on 1 experience. So I used the same load again this year and had completely different and surprising results.

Opening morning I shot a buck at about 70 yards, quartering away. I hit him a few inches behind the close shoulder and it exited through the opposite shoulder. First, the buck only ran 50 yards at the most. Second, the lungs were destroyed. Lastly, when I skinned the buck I was utterly amazed at the LACK of destruction. Butchering the deer myself, I found that even though the bullet exited through the shoulder, there was still plenty of usuable meat after cleaning up around the actual exit wound. Bloodshot meat was limited to just around the impact and exit areas.

At 1100 a herd of 7 does came past my stand & I picked out a mature one and shot her just behind the shoulders while standing broadside to me about about 70 yards. She only made it about 30 yards or so before piling up. Like last years doe, I hit no major bone structure but this year the lungs were destroyed just like the bucks'. Upon skinning and butchering I found that damage was very minimal on her as well.

These rounds were loaded exactly the same as the ones from last year, but the results were about 180 degrees from last year on similar sized animals. The only difference was that last years shot was a little longer but I don't know that a distance of 70 yards (when shooting less than 200 yards) with a .30-06 would make that kind of a difference.


"I suppose it is the way of hunters. We are very odd fellows." ~ Peter Hathaway Capstick
Adam is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 12-04-2010, 01:23 PM
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New Enterprise, Bedford county
Posts: 1,445
Back To Top
Re: Completely different results from 2009

A bullet should fragment less at long range, maybe last years bullet was defective in some way.
Huskyhunter is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 12-12-2010, 11:55 AM
Frequent Contributor
yukon375's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: vertigo
Posts: 638
Back To Top
Re: Completely different results from 2009

thats y u never base an opinion on a few samples.

"No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor."

yukon375 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 12-29-2010, 02:00 AM
New Arrival
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 35
Back To Top
Re: Completely different results from 2009

TTSX bullets are made for rapid expansion and as a result you will often see some fragmentation despite what might be advertised about their weight retention. The idea of ballistic tip bullets is to deliver the maximum amount of energy to the animal. Ideally the bullet will basically fall out the other side. Any energy left to fly after exit is energy that was not inflicted on the animal. I assumed you would know all this since you chose them as your load. Typical due diligence would have yielded this information. Hitting bone with a ballistic tip is going to inflict significant damage, but the tradeoff is the animal generally isnt going anywhere.
KimberMontana is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Outdoor Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome