Grouse and woodcock reports - The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 04:31 PM Thread Starter
Sage
 
Woods walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,661
Back To Top
Grouse and woodcock reports





2011 Ruffed Grouse and Woodcock Forecast
By Larry Brown
This fall looks like another good one for hunters in the upper Midwest, even though that region is now past what should have been the peak of the typical 10-year cycle in grouse numbers. Meanwhile, for the first time in recent years, hunters in the East will benefit from a woodcock season that has been lengthened to 45 days, the same as in the Central Region. And more good news for woodcock hunters: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's annual report ("American Woodcock Population Status, 2011") indicates no significant up or down trend for woodcock in either region for the last decade. It appears that the bird's long-term decline has flattened out.

MINNESOTA was the top producer last year for ruffed grouse, with an estimated harvest of 465,000. That represented an increase of over 100,000 birds compared to the 2009 season, but that's at least partially explained by the fact that there were more grouse hunters last year.

Spring drumming counts decreased in 2010 after hitting a 40-year high the year before, but increased once more this spring. Weather during the nesting season was relatively favorable, which should mean another good season. The top area in the state is the DNR’s northeast survey region. In general, hunting should be good everywhere the habitat mix contains more aspen and fewer conifers.

Although the estimated woodcock harvest was only 35,000, that's more indicative of a relative lack of interest than low bird numbers.

In WISCONSIN, where hunters harvested an estimated 324,000 grouse last year, spring drumming counts increased 38 percent. Although that would seem to indicate an even better season this year, last year should have been the peak. For both grouse and woodcock, an unusually wet spring and early summer in much of northern Wisconsin may have hampered reproduction. The DNR runs summer brood counts that should give a better indication of grouse numbers for this season, and we'll provide them when they become available in early September.

Last year's woodcock harvest was estimated at about 53,000 based on DNR-conducted hunter surveys, and at 42,000 based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Harvest Information Program (HIP). The more heavily forested northern half of the state will be best for both birds.

MICHIGAN led all states in woodcock harvest in 2010, with a HIP-estimated total of 93,000. Although there is no grouse harvest estimate available for last year, flush rates for grouse in 2010 were similar to 2009, and slightly higher for woodcock. Highest flush rates for grouse were in the Upper Peninsula (UP); for woodcock, in northern Lower Michigan.

This year's drumming counts in the UP showed an almost identical increase, at 37 percent, to those in Wisconsin. The counts were about the same as last year in northern Lower Michigan. The forecast for this year is similar to slightly higher for both birds. A late spring appeared to have hampered woodcock reproduction, but banders reported hens with chicks in June, which would indicate successful re-nesting - those re-nests nearly always produce smaller clutches than the four eggs no rmally brooded.

On the East Coast, MAINE experienced a banner season for grouse in 2010, and the state's HIP-estimated harvest of 32,000 woodcock was over twice as large as any other state in the region. The northern part of the state was especially good for grouse, although the rest was only fair at best. Woodcock hunting was surprisingly good.

For this season, northern Maine looks very good again, although there were some heavy rains in June and the harvest may be down somewhat from last year. The spring woodcock survey was up slightly. However, production may have been poor due to an unusually cold May.

For those with a particular interest in woodcock, there are special habitat initiatives under way in both regions: the Northern Forest Woodcock Initiative in New England, and the upper Great Lakes Initiative in the upper Midwest. For more i nformation, go to http://www.timberdoodle.org.




When you are up to your butt in alligators, it is hard to remember your intent was to drain the swamp. Stay focused!
Woods walker is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 05:00 PM
Diehard Outdoorsman
 
FLDBRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N.E. PA.
Posts: 3,922
Back To Top
Re: Grouse and woodcock reports

Did I read that right...an increase of 100,000 birds,that's hard to imagine!I have alway's thought of Minn. as a sleeper state for pheasant.When you look at all it has to offer the upland hunter I think it deserves a hard look for a hunting trip!Interesting report,thank you!

It's breeding,training...and something unknown.
FLDBRED is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 06:09 PM Thread Starter
Sage
 
Woods walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,661
Back To Top
Re: Grouse and woodcock reports

That was an increase for grouse, not pheasant, unless I am missing something.




When you are up to your butt in alligators, it is hard to remember your intent was to drain the swamp. Stay focused!
Woods walker is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 09:01 PM
Diehard Outdoorsman
 
FLDBRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N.E. PA.
Posts: 3,922
Back To Top
Re: Grouse and woodcock reports

I know the increase was for grouse John,bad grammar on my part. I was just saying that in addition to it's excellent grouse hunting,Minnesota also has a pretty decent pheasant population.It wouldn't be a bad idea to plan a trip out there for both!

It's breeding,training...and something unknown.
FLDBRED is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 10:02 PM Thread Starter
Sage
 
Woods walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,661
Back To Top
Re: Grouse and woodcock reports

Ok, I thought I missed something. I know some guys who go out there for grouse and rave about it, I never heard them mention pheasants.




When you are up to your butt in alligators, it is hard to remember your intent was to drain the swamp. Stay focused!
Woods walker is online now  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 10:40 PM
Diehard Outdoorsman
 
FLDBRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N.E. PA.
Posts: 3,922
Back To Top
Re: Grouse and woodcock reports

I think a lot of people would be surprised at the pheasant population in Minnesota.They have been hit hard by some recent severe winters and the loss of good CRP acres,but they still harvest well over 400,000 WILD roosters.As recent as 2007-2008 some estimates on the harvest were at 655,000 birds,which is double what it was in 1987-2000.Their long term goal is to average 750,000 WILD birds by the year 2025,with a range between 400,000 - 1.1 million.They are well on their way of achieving this.Add that to the excellent grouse hunting and you can see how lucky them boys are.Kinda reminds you of Pa. back in the early 70's doesn't it!

It's breeding,training...and something unknown.
FLDBRED is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-31-2011, 10:47 PM Thread Starter
Sage
 
Woods walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,661
Back To Top
Re: Grouse and woodcock reports

Yep.




When you are up to your butt in alligators, it is hard to remember your intent was to drain the swamp. Stay focused!
Woods walker is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the The HuntingPA.com Outdoor Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome