Northern WI county adopts ordinance regulating deer farms - The Outdoor Community
  • 1 Post By casey
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old 01-27-2020, 06:55 AM Thread Starter
casey's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: milford pa-pike county
Posts: 13,775
Back To Top
Northern WI county adopts ordinance regulating deer farms

One northern Wisconsin county passed an ordinance last fall to regulate deer farms in an attempt to prevent the spread of chronic wasting disease, while a neighboring county is considering whether to follow suit. The move is not embraced by deer farmers who feel local control is unnecessary and may be cost-prohibitive for new farms.

Bayfield County adopted state standards for fencing and movement of farm-raised deer. It also included requirements for moving live deer into the county and more frequent fence inspections. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources currently inspects fences once every 10 years, said county conservationist Ben Dufford.

"Bayfield County decided that wasnít good enough, that annual inspections are more necessary," Dufford said.

Any live deer moved to the county must have a certificate of veterinary inspection and be enrolled in the state's herd status program. Deer farmers must also submit a document demonstrating the animal was not housed within 10 miles of known cases of CWD within five years prior to being moved.

Officials have been taking steps to prevent the spread of CWD to the area after fears that a deer herd in the county may have contracted the disease from a southern Wisconsin farm where the animals originated. Far northwestern Wisconsin has been largely unaffected by the fatal neurological deer disease.

The ordinance doesnít include a requirement to double-fence new deer farms, although a county committee had recommended added fencing in a report earlier this year in an attempt to reduce the risk of the disease's spread. Currently, whitetail deer farms in Wisconsin are required to have a single, 8-foot-tall perimeter fence. The state had also approved an emergency rule to require enhanced fencing of deer farms last year, but it expired in February.

Laurie Seale, vice president of the group Whitetails of Wisconsin, said the ordinance is unacceptable for the deer farmers they represent.

"Basically, when you start requiring restrictions that werenít in place when you started your business, youíre forcing people out of business," Seale said.

She also fears local regulation will prevent new farmers from coming into the industry. Seale said efforts to oversee farms at the local level stem from a lack of education about the regulations currently in place, adding that any oversight of the industry is best left to the state.

"Deer farmers are doing everything they can to prevent the disease from coming onto our farms," she said. "Thatís why we abide by the rules and regulations we have in place because itís a death sentence for our farms. Nobody wants to prevent it more than deer farmers."

Neighboring Douglas County has also been exploring local regulation of deer farms to prevent the spread of CWD, including possibly requiring double-fencing. The county recently extended its moratorium on any new deer farms.

Keith Allen, a county board supervisor, serves on a committee thatís studying the issue. He supports adding a second fence or barrier around new deer farms to reduce the risk of the diseaseís transmission.

"Iím an avid deer hunter," said Allen. "I donít want to see this disease come up and decimate our herd up here."

Peter Clark also serves on the committee, but he believes deer farms have been unfairly targeted as the disease has spread, affecting 56 counties statewide. He said the county needs to strike a balance between the industry and the well-being of the public and wild deer herd.

"For those people whoíve already established businesses, especially those who donít have any marks against them, I want to see them treated fairly and given the opportunity to thrive and run a successful, safe business," he said.

Clark would also like to see the state and hunters step up and do their part to prevent the diseaseís spread.

In December, Allen said it may be another three to six months before the committee wraps up its review and makes any recommendations on local regulation of deer farms.

Meanwhile, Dufford said Bayfield County plans to begin fence inspections of the countyís two deer farms sometime in the spring.

Since the DNR began testing for CWD in Wisconsin, there have been more than 6,500 positives out of more than 245,000 samples as of mid-January. As of Jan. 7, there have been more than 400 CWD-positive tests at deer farms and hunting ranches in the state, according to data from the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection.
lanctrapper likes this.
casey is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old 01-31-2020, 10:37 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: lancaster
Posts: 11,700
Back To Top
Tough call all the way round. I feel for the farmers, but a responsible one knows it is for the betterment of the industry. I do feel there is a lot of unfair blame placed on the deer farmers by hunters. Could be both deer farming and deer hunting is doomed no matter what.
zimmerstutzen is online now  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Outdoor Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome