I gave the benefit of the doubt by placing ??? behind the statement.
I know veins are popping on foreheads already on here but lets see opinions defending or disputing what will be considered Fake News
Seriously! After the last 8 years? We already had a president that did irreparable damage to this country and now we are seeing the results.
Whatever he does I'm just glad we don't have Hillary!
If the press went after Barack like this he would have been out early too.
Let me ask this. Since does a judge have the authority to usurp a presidents order? He is not privy to the intelligence info and classified information that the president is? Trump needs to fire all who are not loyal to him just as bobama did and move on.
When Piers Morgan of all people calls out the media for being overly partisan, well, maybe it's time to re-examine the media's narrative. Maybe they are whipping up fake hysteria. Maybe the people buying it need to take a step back.
I took notice that many internet news sources have reports that make irrational leaps of logic in the conclusions reached by the reporter. Because Trump spoke to a Russian during the campaign, he should be prosecuted for treason? Had Obama and Hillary talked to the Russians we might not have the Syrian problem Trump inherited.
Would any one claim treason if a Jewish candidate had talked to Israeli officials during the campaign? Ronnie Regan was praised for his ability to keep up a dialogue with everyone. Suddenly it is treason? These folks are short term memory morons.
In the past few weeks, I noticed that face book replies to liberal posts were eliminated within a few hours if the reply differed from the affiliation of the post.
Even Matt Lauer of the today show has been getting rather biased in his side comments.